The GP who saw Baby Peter missed a “unique opportunity” to send him to hospital just eight days before his death, a hearing has been told.
Peter’s mother, her boyfriend, Steven Barker, and his brother, Jason Owen, were jailed in May last year for causing or allowing his death.
Dr Ikwueke is the second doctor to face GMC allegations over Peter’s care.
Consultant paediatrician Sabah Al-Zayyat is accused of failing to spot that he was suffering abuse two days before his death.
She was due to face a GMC disciplinary panel in February but did not turn up.
The hearing was adjourned until a later date after she was said to be “suicidal”.
The above is reported via BBC News.
…… …. ….. …..
I’ve mentioned little Baby P, Baby Peter before, and I’ve also mentioned GPs and the GMC. But what I may not have mentioned is the almost-equivalent situation of a GP missing a ‘unique’ opportunity. My 83-year old was unable to breathe, unable to swallow, unable to move, unable to call for help. Eventually, but about 3 days too late, the care home was asked to call a doctor immediately, when another relative visited, by pure chance, at the care home.
Two hours later, the staff managed to call a GP, who arrived another hour later, and diagnosed a suspected UTI (urinary tract infection). The GP issued a prescription for Trimethoprim. The GP departed, having spent a grand total of approximately 12 minutes in the building, from signing in to signing out.
The GP failed to ask the care home nurses about the past medical history of a patient she had never met before, never seen before. As a result the GP failed to discover that the person she was now visiting was a Diabetic. If that GP had bothered to ask questions about the medications being given to a patient they had never met before, then that GP would have realised that the patient was on the brink of a diabetic coma.
My relative may have lived.
But she was admitted to hospital less than 24 hours later, in a diabetic coma. And she died there, 3 weeks later.
The GMC? I have complained, and I am still considering my options. But it strikes me that the GMC is protecting the GP. I am not allowed to view the ‘supporting evidence’ submitted to the GMC as a result of my complaint. And yet, the documentation that the GMC has already allowed me to see indicates the extent to which the GMC has been misled, hoodwinked. Call it whatever you will.
Justice will never be justice-seen-to-be-done as long as systems of protection are in place to protect the guilty. Or at least, those who are prepared to ‘bend the truth’. In their own ‘best interests’, of course, rather than in the best interests of their patients and their family.