CSR = Comprehensive Spending Review
CSR = Cheer Smirk Rejoice
LibDemCon MPs cheered –they smirked – they rejoiced.
LibDemCon MPs applauded, smiling, seeming satisfied that they had destroyed enough.
Coalition Ministers smiled even as their own departmental budgets were cut.
The poorest will lose a higher proportion of their income than the average, according to the government’s own graphs. Brendan Barber TUC General Secretary said that the poorest tenth of the population would lose a fifth of their income because of Coalition cuts; the richest would lose just 1.5 per cent of their income. He may now revise that estimate.
Some councils will go bust.
750,000 public sector job cuts are forecast. Or more?
Twice as many women as men work in the public sector and 40% of all female workers are employed by the state. Women have been encouraged to become gainfully employed, largely in the public sector, with young children being placed into childcare, another largely female industry. The majority of care workers are women. Not many male librarians where I live. It’s rare to meet a male in local admin jobs either. Is this a plan to send women back to the past? Could that really be seen as progress?
An additional £7bn welfare cuts, on top of the £11bn already announced.
The convenient accounting that has gone on with the £2bn to social care (via the NHS in part) is a con! That money is not ring-fenced, so it will just be swallowed up by the big local authority pot that has just been cut savagely via the CSR. Goodbye social care; an unwelcome return of the poorhouse/workhouse. And don’t be fooled by this attempt to persuade people to use Personal Budgets. They are enormously complex to operate, requiring most people who’ve tried them to turn themselves into employers, or to employ someone to manage the Personal Budget for them. Or is that another part of the con trick? The responsibilities of unpaid carers will increase; the burden of care will fall on their shoulders. Their narrow shoulders, not the broad shoulders mentioned by Creepy Osborne.
Any government that can remove the mobility component of DLA from people in residential care cannot sink much lower. At the moment, many people in residential care are allowed the grand total of £21 per week for ‘spending money’, after their care costs have been paid for. That’s all they are allowed to retain. Remove the mobility allowance and they will be trapped forever, within the walls of the care home. Is that really the best we can offer and still call it ‘care’?
The IFS says spending review cuts are regressive and will hit the poorest in society, not the richest.
This is not what I call ‘fair’. Nor are we all in this together. The Big Society? Not sure that one will wash any more!
By strange coincidence of the calendar, Nick Clegg has just been named Communicator of the Year at the PRWeek awards. “The judges (sixty-two senior PR professionals) praised Clegg for his smart general election communications campaign that positioned him as a fresh alternative to the other political parties.
In fewer than 12 months, Clegg has gone from leading a party frustrated by a lack of media attention to the full glare of the world’s media, as he walked side by side with Prime Minister David Cameron into 10 Downing Street on 11 May.”
Style over substance; if Clegg was that good a communicator, the Liberal Democrats would have won the general election, as opposed to having to swallow everything they ‘communicated’ beforehand in order to shack up with the Tories.
Joanna Lumley won that same award last year. “She was chosen by judges for her work spearheading the Gurkha campaign for settlement rights. As a figurehead she was able to move seamlessly from the media scrum to heavyweight political programmes such as the Andrew Marr Show, and had the clout to secure meetings at the highest political level.”
Joanna Lumley might make a better fist of government than this bunch of clowns.